From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 17 00:30:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B215F2C; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20C42BE3; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id r8H0UffE037900; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:30:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r8H0UfMq037899; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:30:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:30:41 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Olivier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cochard-Labb=E9?= Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] GEOM direct dispatch and fine-grained CAM locking Message-ID: <20130917003041.GA74198@alchemy.franken.de> References: <520D4ADB.50209@FreeBSD.org> <5224511D.4090503@FreeBSD.org> <20130903134251.GB43281@caravan.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD SCSI , Outback Dingo X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:30:44 -0000 On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:48:38PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if > > theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to > > help further it. > > Just checking to see how widely its been tested, > > I've installed this patch on 3 differents machines there status after > about 12hours: > - SUN FIRE X4170 M2 (amd64: r255178) with 6 SAS harddrives in one big > zraid (LSI MegaSAS Gen2 controller): Used for generating package with > poudriere? no probleme since; > - HAL/Fujitsu SPARC64-V (sparc64: r255178) with two SCSI-3 disks in > gmirror: Used for generating package with poudriere too? no probleme > since; For testing GEOM direct dispatch on sparc64, please additionally use the following patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_GET_STACK_USAGE.diff Marius