From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Nov 10 07:27:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8D9A2B8BF; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B4A1E13; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so233114963pas.2; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 23:27:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LamKoW21/FHKYXgq8pPaHg3KX+6INEJBdGnuJm/7Xv8=; b=XNKOBzzANA1HlqZlNBBhHUglMXG+7Rkyo4xslICd7ZkPgcfhn+JF/Cw4p9+J2FMcEc nQgoO6icGNC1DfOwJq5BA3KJvD2mYR57O0yCTcs9vVG4S1HzmU5Y+FV04wZWzOUJkpXH 7vfQTHdshhPlN1mZX3vC/gaAuwLl2sCRNtre+wYbUVOsDw4Yi+0fQTfaN0LgnLA4tsBH J4RWurB82Gbk1gfrBBBmr2VKfc80nhfYT7mbkctCqSnKpMeC2naVcrfGjNIIq3iSC2u9 EO8kovwjQNM9+n1NQSpp2lsOK6PCOpY1XxtS6oJNy3Us2BUfJjiPTEQfHLsz3bRzgh17 BmBQ== X-Received: by 10.66.227.197 with SMTP id sc5mr3308618pac.157.1447140434724; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 23:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:7d16:8357:a5e4:2525? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-7d16-8357-a5e4-2525.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:7d16:8357:a5e4:2525]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qk7sm2204525pbb.80.2015.11.09.23.27.11 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 23:27:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388648 - in head/net: asterisk11 asterisk13 References: <201506052330.t55NUBZL020965@svn.freebsd.org> <564044BC.5050203@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer , Adam Weinberger , Alexey Dokuchaev , Guido Falsi Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <56419C4A.6080809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:27:06 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:27:15 -0000 On 9/11/2015 11:01 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Looking at the above I'd vouch for "Build with current GCC" which My guess/feeling is the word current is at a minimum confusing and at worse misleading/wrong. Second, I don't think it's necessary to specify what is ultimately only a ports framework implementation detail, in the description itself. What is the benefit to the user? * Have foo built with versus whatever it built with without this option enabled