From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 15 10:49:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB6714BE4 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:49:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA21333; Mon, 15 Mar 1999 15:48:57 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199903151848.PAA21333@roma.coe.ufrj.br> Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-Reply-To: <199903140938.SAA23606@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> from Kazutaka YOKOTA at "Mar 14, 1999 6:38:17 pm" To: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (Kazutaka YOKOTA) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 15:48:57 -0300 (EST) Cc: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG #define quoting(Kazutaka YOKOTA) // The 3.1-RELEASE is only one month old and users are just starting to // install it on their machines. We have had a bunch of initial You mean, those users who have already received their CDs (no brasilian included, IIRC)... :) Is there something so serious in 3.1 to deserve another release ? I must agree 3.0 was a mess, but 3.1 seems to be just fine for me (until now). I'd vote to continue the standard schedule for 3.2, and use cvsup for upgrades. Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro "This .sig is not meant to be politically correct." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message