From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 13 21:25:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37626DD9; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B47F173D; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3DLOxlX025530; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:24:59 GMT (envelope-from jilles@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jilles@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s3DLOwnt025529; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:24:58 GMT (envelope-from jilles) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:24:58 GMT Message-Id: <201404132124.s3DLOwnt025529@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jau@iki.fi, jilles@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: jilles@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/175674: [libc] [patch] sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:25:00 -0000 Synopsis: [libc] [patch] sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: jilles State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 13 21:24:03 UTC 2014 State-Changed-Why: This was applied to 10-current. An MFC seems unnecessary to me. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=175674