From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 22:37:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CA7106566B for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from lexi.siliconlandmark.com (lexi.siliconlandmark.com [66.184.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B6E8FC1C for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from 159.sub-97-145-136.myvzw.com (159.sub-97-145-136.myvzw.com [97.145.136.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by lexi.siliconlandmark.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0GMbsEQ070408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:37:57 GMT (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Message-Id: From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <23243.1232140762@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:37:52 -0500 References: <23243.1232140762@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.1/8872/Fri Jan 16 16:55:46 2009 on lexi.siliconlandmark.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Lcdproc] LCDProc CVS + PicoLCD on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:38:00 -0000 On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message E744B2F19C99@siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Gu > ibert de Bruet writes: >> On Jan 16, 2009, at 5:09 AM, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>>> Unfortunately the PicoLCD 2X20 and 4X20 devices present >>>> themselves as HID devices. >>> >>> ...but... they *are* HID devices. Why is this "unfortunate"? > > It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that > is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example. > > The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID > specification. PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to produce the bits required for usb2 as well? Many thanks, Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 436f 6465 2070 6f65 742e 2042 6974 206a */ /* Managing Partner * 6f63 6b65 792e 2053 7973 4164 6d69 6e2e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 2055 4e49 5820 736c 6575 7468 2e00 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * C/C++, Java, Perl, PHP, SQL, XHTML, XML */