From owner-freebsd-net Tue Mar 19 15:41:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from avengers.ivision.co.uk (avengers.ivision.co.uk [212.25.225.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8692A37B41B for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [212.25.225.7] (helo=avengers) by avengers.ivision.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16nTDu-0004jO-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:40:58 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:40:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Jasper Wallace To: Mike Silbersack Cc: Subject: Re: ephemeral port allocation - time for a change? In-Reply-To: <20020319111522.H49521-100000@patrocles.silby.com> Message-ID: X-NCC-RegID: uk.instant-web MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > My question is this: Is anyone aware of a reason that using 49152-65535 > by default would cause problems today? NetBSD has moved to the new range: jasper@jellycat:~/[0]> sysctl -a | grep port net.inet.ip.anonportmin = 49152 net.inet.ip.anonportmax = 65535 I'm not aware of any problems. -- Internet Vision Internet Consultancy Tel: 020 7589 4500 60 Albert Court & Web development Fax: 020 7589 4522 Prince Consort Road vision@ivision.co.uk London SW7 2BE http://www.ivision.co.uk/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message