From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 05:16:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DA316A4FF for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 05:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gladiator.trusc.net (gladiator.trusc.net [196.22.225.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9271643D3F for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 05:15:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leon@trusc.net) Received: from [196.25.37.18] (helo=morpheus.trusc.net) by gladiator.trusc.net (Exim 4.24 #0 (FreeBSD 4.7)) protocol: esmtp id 1BSxJX-0003C7-Od for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:15:20 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by morpheus.trusc.net (Exim 4.34 #0 (FreeBSD 4.7)) protocol: esmtp id 1BSxIl-000BDN-MF ; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:14:31 +0200 Received: from morpheus.trusc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (morpheus.trusc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00212-12; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:14:30 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [192.168.255.25] (helo=leonlap) by morpheus.trusc.net (Exim 4.34 #0 (FreeBSD 4.7)) protocol: esmtp id 1BSxIk-000BDI-9y ; Wed, 26 May 2004 14:14:30 +0200 From: "Leon Botes" To: Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:15:12 +0200 Organization: Trusc Technologies (Pty) Ltd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRDGDMreUkMXzbNQuemGPNWq2uKXQAAf6jA In-Reply-To: <1085572475.8815.1.camel@nelis.brabys.co.za> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at trusc.net Message-Id: cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Help with a routing issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: leon@trusc.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 12:16:00 -0000 Set it to zero mmrserver# sysctl net | grep direct net.inet.ip.redirect: 0 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect: 0 net.inet.icmp.log_redirect: 0 Results are the same. Also tried adding a fixed route as such: Route add -host 196.25.37.18 192.168.254.1 No luck. -----Original Message----- From: Nelis Lamprecht [mailto:nelis@8ball.co.za] Sent: 26 May 2004 13:55 To: leon@trusc.net Subject: RE: Help with a routing issue One other thing you can try. There is a sysctl variable net.inet.ip.redirect: 1 Try turning that off by setting it to 0 on the client machine. What happens ? Nelis On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:08, Leon Botes wrote: > Tried that already - no luck. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nelis Lamprecht [mailto:nelis@8ball.co.za] > Sent: 26 May 2004 13:01 > To: leon@trusc.net > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > Subject: RE: Help with a routing issue > > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 12:28, Leon Botes wrote: > > > The below is only sections of the output. Most of the individual > > hosts have been removed. Just a few examples left. > > 10.5/16 192.168.254.29 UGSc 0 11 fxp1 > > 10.6/16 192.168.254.12 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.7/16 192.168.254.12 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.8/16 192.168.254.12 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.9/16 192.168.254.27 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.11/16 192.168.254.28 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.12/16 192.168.254.33 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.13/16 192.168.254.34 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 10.14/16 192.168.252.23 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 2214 lo0 > > 192.168.0 192.168.254.23 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 192.168.2 192.168.254.24 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 192.168.7 192.168.254.31 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 192.168.60 192.168.254.22 UGSc 0 0 fxp1 > > 192.168.252 192.168.254.12 UGSc 8 161 fxp1 > > 192.168.253 192.168.254.12 UGSc 13 212 fxp1 > > 192.168.254 link#2 UC 34 0 fxp1 > > 192.168.254.1 00:20:ed:11:00:e9 UHLW 2 1425 lo0 > > 192.168.254.22 00:02:6f:32:27:6b UHLW 1 1032 fxp1 116 > > 192.168.254.23 00:50:bf:97:e4:9d UHLW 1 2292 fxp1 777 > > 192.168.254.24 00:50:bf:43:2c:16 UHLW 3 3476 fxp1 421 > > 192.168.254.25 00:a0:cc:db:03:75 UHLW 1 836 fxp1 1117 > > 192.168.254.27 00:02:6f:07:86:5b UHLW 1 224 fxp1 878 > > 192.168.254.28 link#2 UHLW 1 0 fxp1 > > 192.168.254.29 00:02:6f:07:86:57 UHLW 1 139 fxp1 924 > > 192.168.254.30 00:02:6f:07:86:6a UHLW 0 779 fxp1 741 > > 192.168.254.31 00:02:6f:08:9f:a6 UHLW 1 161 fxp1 936 > > 192.168.254.32 00:02:6f:04:7a:1e UHLW 0 165 fxp1 59 > > 192.168.254.33 link#2 UHLW 1 92 fxp1 > > 192.168.255 192.168.254.21 UGSc 3 37107 fxp1 > > 196.25.37.16/29 link#1 UC 4 0 fxp0 > > 196.25.37.17 00:e0:fc:0c:be:d9 UHLW 29 230 fxp0 790 > > 196.25.37.18 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW 1 2127 lo0 > > 196.25.37.19 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW 1 370 lo0 => > > 196.25.37.19/32 link#1 UC 1 0 fxp0 > > 196.25.37.20 00:0c:f1:ae:c6:99 UHLW 1 44305 fxp0 908 > > 196.25.37.22 00:09:5b:3f:2f:63 UHLW 1 11942 fxp0 910 > > Can't see any peculiarities. Try adding the following route on the > client > machine: > > route add -host 196.25.37.18 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.255 > > See if that helps. > > -- > Nelis Lamprecht > PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc > "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are."