From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 24 05:04:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE5F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 24 May 2004 05:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 044E243D54
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 24 May 2004 05:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa84262@salmon>; 24 May 2004 13:04:34 +0100 (BST)
To: Rob <stopspam@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 May 2004 06:45:19 +0900."
             <40B11B6F.2070201@users.sourceforge.net> 
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:04:33 +0100
From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <200405241304.aa84262@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: USB patch for better bus_dma and detachment support 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 12:04:49 -0000

In message <40B11B6F.2070201@users.sourceforge.net>, Rob writes:
>Can I apply this patch also safely to STABLE?
>If not, then, if you make a patch for STABLE, I would test it right away!
>
>My umass storage USB toy, crashes the system when I umount it.
>I blamed the USB chipset (VIA 83C572 USB controller), but am still not sure,
>since I did not get much response from the STABLE list.
>
>It would be great if your patch would solve the crash!

The patch is against -CURRENT only. It might not be a lot of work
to port it to -STABLE, but I doubt I'll find time to do that soon
unfortunately.

It's quite unlikely that the patch will solve your crash anyway,
as the symptoms you describe don't sound related to the problems
the patch attempts to address. Did you post a stack trace for the
crash? (reply privately to me with details if you've aready posted
them somewhere).

Ian