From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Nov  2  4:12: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.it-netservice.de (mail.it-netservice.de [213.179.64.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B55BB37B4E5; Thu,  2 Nov 2000 04:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phase2.intern.itns.de (phase2.intern.itns.de [192.168.2.209])
	by mail.it-netservice.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA26205;
	Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:13:39 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:13:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Ruediger Bahls <christian@it-netservice.de>
X-Sender: christian@phase2.intern.it-netservice.de
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FW: Pine 4.30 now available (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <20001101104357.A21000@citusc17.usc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011021312360.1666-100000@phase2.intern.it-netservice.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hmm but still i can't make install pine ...
it tells me that there exist remotely
exploitable vulnerabilities in pine

?


On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 05:26:12PM +0100, Christian Ruediger Bahls wrote:
> > is it still possible to merge the
> > new version of pine into
> > the ports-tree of 4.2-RELEASE ?
> 
> Maybe..however unless they have silently fixed other things, the
> current port also fixes the known vulnerability, so running the
> FreeBSD pine-4.21_1 port shouldn't give you any more of an uneasy
> feeling than running pine in the first place should :-)
> 
> Kris
> 

-- 
Christian Bahls
Networking Dep.
iT-netservice GmbH
Leipzig, Germany




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message