From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 20 21:21:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA15940 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 21:21:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA15935 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 21:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id LAA17185; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:00:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from knobel.gun.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knobel.gun.de (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA01488; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 10:53:06 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 10:53:05 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm To: Joerg Wunsch cc: FreeBSD hackers Subject: Re: BSDvs Lxxxxx Flame.. In-Reply-To: <199601180916.KAA25329@uriah.heep.sax.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 18 Jan 1996, J Wunsch wrote: > As Marty Leisner wrote: > > > > > > Can someone provide hard information about nfs serving capability > > on identical hardware between linux and freebsd? > > > > I'm very disappointed at the nfs performance on linux...I've used > > No ``hard information'', but most linux guys admit that their NFS > server is about the worst piece of the system. > > I've seen 800 KB/s being piped out of a FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 machine, going > to a single SGI Indy. Hmmm, and who's the performance now with 2.1 or -current ? Do you have some number for a comparison ? -- andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ - Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de - \/ ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz apsfilter - magic print filter 4lpd >>> knobel is powered by FreeBSD <<<