From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 19:55:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB89716A420 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@FreeBSD.org) Received: from spacemail2-out.mgmt.space.net (spacemail2-out.mgmt.Space.Net [194.97.149.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340C013C45B for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@FreeBSD.org) X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,240,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="63447180" Received: from mail.atsec.com ([195.30.252.105]) by spacemail2-out.mgmt.space.net with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2007 21:55:34 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.12] (p5087739D.dip.t-dialin.net [80.135.115.157]) (Authenticated sender: se@atsec.com) by mail.atsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB2672092F; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <470939B5.2090309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:55:33 +0200 From: Stefan Esser User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20071007105235.GA2505@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> <20071007171541.4bd00627@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <20071007171541.4bd00627@deskjail> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Patch] man page nsswitch(5) still references cached in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:55:36 -0000 Alexander Leidinger schrieb: >> BTW: There appear to be broken man page related entries in Obsoletefiles.inc >> (perhaps because of a line length limit in the case of the latter two files >> in the following list???): > > Why do you think it is a length limit which is the cause of the > problems you see? Well, see the last two lines, 63 chars long, 10 for "OLD_FILES+=" and 53 chars for the file name. It may be that files were added to the list by a cut&paste action and that some characters had wrapped around to the next line and were forgotten. But it is not relevant, just strange. >> OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man5/cached.conf.5 >> OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man8/cached.8 >> OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man3/set_assertion_failure_callback.3. >> OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man3/SSL_COMP_add_compression_method.3 [...] > I can confirm that if the files are installed as XXX.gz, they have to > be listed as XXX.gz in ObsoleteFiles.inc. Yes, and the four lines above are the only ones that do not end in ".gz". I forgot to CC my mail to re@, but Michael Bushkov reviewed it, found that I had replaced one instance of cached too many and the corrected patch to re@ for approval ... Regards, STefan