From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 28 7:55:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1656737B400 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3482943E09 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:55:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely5.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5SEtRMa090592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:55:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely5.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g5SEtSFJ025911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:55:28 +0200 (CEST)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely5.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id g5SEtRpd025910; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:55:27 +0200 (CEST)?g (envelope-from ticso) Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:55:27 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Julian Elischer Cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: something funny with soft updates? Message-ID: <20020628145526.GS14535@cicely5.cicely.de> Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely5.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:27:30AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I did a small test today to try test the speed impact of > the KSE test. > during this, I noticed that soft updates is not having it's usual > performance increaseing effect.. > > Normal kernel, soft updates: > 1387.881u 603.392s 35:48.63 92.6% 2694+2248k 12424+3310io 3587pf+0w > KSE kernel, soft updates: > 1385.979u 605.575s 35:21.41 93.8% 2695+2252k 11558+3300io 3705pf+0w > Normal kernel, NO softupdates: > 1389.803u 594.961s 35:59.14 91.9% 2697+2248k 11839+66940io 3701pf+0w You measured it - great. After updating an -current alpha I had the strong impression that a cvs update was much slower than before. The timerange of my update was 17th to 21st June. I did not notice a slowdown with the 17th kernel, but I'm not absolutely shure either. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message