Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:48:52 -0800
From:      Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident]
Message-ID:  <CAOgwaMvUriCjg%2Bq28cx3H0a7swbYtcziWeXwJ=LOGwKhvjuGYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <k8d914$ssl$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <CAD2Ti29UoFcHendR8CcdQ4FPNW1HH0O47B1i3JW00Lke2m2POg@mail.gmail.com> <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> <op.wnxq9eo0g7njmm@michael-think> <CADLo838oG26KmfHJ%2BtLh82GoJzzRtfqy69%2BNny1_DC8F8X4POQ@mail.gmail.com> <k8d914$ssl$1@ger.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> > (and is GPL btw)
>
> Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
> proper crypto signing using GPG:
>
>
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2FTechnicalDetails.How_do_Mercurial_hashes_get_calculated.3F
>
>
>

http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING
"
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
  <http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l2>Version 2, June
1991

 <http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l3>;
"

In their repository , it is GPL v2 .

Is there any other place which specifies its license as BSDL ?


Thank you very much .

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOgwaMvUriCjg%2Bq28cx3H0a7swbYtcziWeXwJ=LOGwKhvjuGYw>