From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 12:48:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD146E12; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396548FC14; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so6406765vba.13 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:48:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RWYYZ+qZ60CQJ4ahX6jdItyrCSl7GH+lhI2UP6VW5eo=; b=u8GYOoOrVzS/ADdxt/gqBDl4p9cYdosrWSWzlsYRQPUXDEw0ZGym3H7GYctoY3zfS5 /H9YYkotX2ewjTIwqfS/NTqQ3gtpDIGv1QAfKSlQ74ZzYzRj83qlguZ2L6Lk6cdwnEkt Gs7ZMoN3VGemHvpdhxtrmyu0tExivcljsPN+1Es43l1cX8qG+HFOzTLmkRgxkrZwqjP3 XktUdOGZD4QBk9ahRdOBvho31a1fe6J4faAkBsXyYZoSLuGgwXDDWv1Wt3Qez6yCWzm3 vDYfcrWABbK4d09uQ/J+Tg/Ms5Wq1xQDHSI9dnW1wpMiqq1Tc+SA3wSfa8EkULVXHlQW LYgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.90.212 with SMTP id by20mr16897257vdb.118.1353329332897; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.218.35 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:48:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:48:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident] From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:48:56 -0000 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote: > > > (and is GPL btw) > > Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has > proper crypto signing using GPG: > > > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2FTechnicalDetails.How_do_Mercurial_hashes_get_calculated.3F > > > http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING " GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 " In their repository , it is GPL v2 . Is there any other place which specifies its license as BSDL ? Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk