Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:37 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: cvs deprecated
Message-ID:  <CADLo83-wj=SbfOtHGP-Mmn6hYxS=kmPcdjo8oSMvgps2WPmqFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301357280.2953@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212271016340.35118@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CALeGphzCDoHG6P1qfW3AuAap2ZudA6Yk%2B5zc0X4wBfr9gE1n%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301357280.2953@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Dec 2012 12:58, "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
wrote:
>
> do ports have to be updated this way or i can use portsnap as today? will
portsnap be continued or is too deprecated?

Portsnap is staying.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-wj=SbfOtHGP-Mmn6hYxS=kmPcdjo8oSMvgps2WPmqFg>