From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 30 13:18:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A472B6CA
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com
 [209.85.223.180])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB6F8FC0A
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so14120094ieb.25
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:18:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=NPiTZe6vzLJ9qRVTsL67DBJqRRkPH7A9OdXgc/1btuM=;
 b=Ylx/c9V9DV1wiF2UFMmmqlTQiJ/E3SVGzy+4WjGkDVFUJQyoXFqDP/hnNywgiFAVau
 MlhBpxAD0rzmcQ1kp/E8Ro2gmeTUPwmjnE4qa70YIJntU3o2ObqyDib8DoJiu4wpDrG/
 pzmDUCgJXZSXa7JyiKatLklOCJHn3HZ6eyODdTQDR1kQBBZjQTuXSWliKXD1Vsm8veCV
 ftAEymbb9amTzFG7VfV5n54/ztk+yl7HKAzYB0C8RG5VK4Nl8WUdtkCo7C6+H2O3S1zo
 2PDv4BasscvjluY1lcoLANbHN8s3AnovoTu0VNAhsrJr+EioXAD0Y29KIRGtWxK7ZN/6
 vhqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.152.137 with SMTP id uy9mr33001233igb.62.1356873518412;
 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.65.132 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.65.132 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:18:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301357280.2953@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212271016340.35118@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <CALeGphzCDoHG6P1qfW3AuAap2ZudA6Yk+5zc0X4wBfr9gE1n+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301357280.2953@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CADLo83-wj=SbfOtHGP-Mmn6hYxS=kmPcdjo8oSMvgps2WPmqFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cvs deprecated
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:44 -0000

On 30 Dec 2012 12:58, "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
wrote:
>
> do ports have to be updated this way or i can use portsnap as today? will
portsnap be continued or is too deprecated?

Portsnap is staying.

Chris