Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:54:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: patches/ handling Message-ID: <20000607115452.A14946@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000607134522.A353@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 01:45:23PM -0500 References: <20000605184259.A21736@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000607090533.D44242@FreeBSD.org> <20000607091405.A55268@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000607202517.D15229@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000607134522.A353@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 01:45:23PM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: > I believe a better way to achieve this will be to make more non-x86 > hardware available, with jailed trees so that committers can work > independently of one another on the same machine, to ensure that > their patches work across the architectures the core OS supports. We can maybe make this happen. Can you or someone else comeup with the configuration for this? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000607115452.A14946>