From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 15:47:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F1F1065678; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363D18FC1C; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <48875291.1000802@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:47:29 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Tanis References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Auto-saving distfiles on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:47:34 -0000 James Tanis wrote: > "cpghost" wrote: >> The ports would still go to the primary sites (to conserve bandwidth), >> but should the original distfile disappear, it would be still available >> on freebsd. > > I think his problem comes from the fact that some ports don't do this, not > that it isn't a good idea. The port maintainers just never did it. No, you're both mistaken: # MASTER_SITE_BACKUP # - Backup location(s) for distribution files and patch # files if not found locally and ${MASTER_SITES}/${PATCH_SITES} # Default: # ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/${DIST_SUBDIR}/ All ports fall back to fetching from the master distfile repository if they can't be found at the upstream sites. This dates back at least to 1996. Kris