Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:48:41 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org> To: Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> Subject: Re: New patchset for acpi_wmi/acpi_hp Message-ID: <569A23CD-0CDE-454D-BF8A-A37BA3BE1020@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4A4A5D5C.3000400@bindone.de> References: <4A48DEB8.1040808@bindone.de> <83012DEA-D524-49CA-A8D2-6B03E69C4ED5@freebsd.org> <4A49E411.1060509@bindone.de> <3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2@mail.gmail.com> <4A4A5D5C.3000400@bindone.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Jun 2009, at 19:45, Michael Gmelin wrote: > Paul B. Mahol wrote: >> On 6/30/09, Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> wrote: >>> Rui Paulo wrote: >>>> On 29 Jun 2009, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> please find attached more patches against CURRENT of today. These >>>>> patches include the patches I've sent on the 27th. >> >> Everything points they do not. >> >>>> Committed, thanks. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rui Paulo >>>> >>> cool thanks, this should be pretty stable and clean enough so I >>> don't >>> expect any changes besides adding supported hardware to the man >>> page in >>> the near future (keeping my fingers crossed :) >>> >> >> For some reason patches used for this commit do not have anywhere >> "verbose" >> sysctl in code, and cat /dev/hpcmi doesnt work for me using code >> from CURRENT. >> Better side of story is that acpica no longer complains about DTD. >> >> >> Sorry, I really should noticed and reported this much before ... >> > Damnit, you're right. Don't know what actually happened. > > Sorry Rui, can you help me out? Yes. Send me the correct patch. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?569A23CD-0CDE-454D-BF8A-A37BA3BE1020>