From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 21:31:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BA7106564A; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACC28FC0A; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C0CDD56205; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:31:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:31:05 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20110718213105.GC31033@lonesome.com> References: <20110716060713.GA25856@lonesome.com> <20110718130344.GA72546@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110718130344.GA72546@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: linimon@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the state of ports on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:31:06 -0000 On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 01:07:13AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > print/teTeX-texmf freebsd-doc 298 missing file on install > > I can install/build package for this port on sparc64 fine. Well, a re-run seems to have made it build. I am investigating. > Looking at > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=teTeX-texmf > > it seems the install error is issued > only when using clang. Is that correct? Nope. If it's calling it "clang" that is a false positive from the error classifier. I have not yet tried a ports build with clang on sparc. Since many ports still do not build on i386 with clang, there's not much point yet. mcl