Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 12:03:55 +0200 From: Gordon Bergling <gbe@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 behind NAT Message-ID: <20200913100355.GA92586@lion.0xfce3.net> In-Reply-To: <7CBF59D0-6A1C-45B3-A877-669D2B9A40C5@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20200912154231.GA27224@lion.0xfce3.net> <7CBF59D0-6A1C-45B3-A877-669D2B9A40C5@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:11:24PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 12 Sep 2020, at 15:42, Gordon Bergling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > does anyone know if it is possible to create an IPv6 tunnel via a > > tunnelbroker, > > Hurricane Electric for example, if the system is behind a NAT > > connection? > > See https://ipv6.he.net/certification/faq.php > > Search for the section labeled “Tunnel Broker” and read the notes. > > /bz Thanks for the link. I remember that I have read about ip protocol 41 somewhere else and the problem was, that my old EasyBox router can be configured to pass this protocol. Maybe I can upgrade the EasyBox to somewhat OpenWRT based. -- Gordon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200913100355.GA92586>