From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 10 23:02:39 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5FD3037B401; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6D3CF43FB1; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (scratch.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.3])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3B62T8W066999;
	Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200304110602.h3B62T8W066999@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: nate@root.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101108290.31875-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c
 src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec
 Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 06:02:39 -0000

On 10 Apr, Nate Lawson wrote:

> My question was different:  since jail already implies
> a location in file namespace, why implement a new and disjoint namespace
> for it?

That was my reaction.  Why not just use the path as the ID, unless you
want to allow two distinct jails to share the same root directory?