Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:36:43 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mntopts.h mount.8 mount.c src/sbin/mount_std mount_std.8
Message-ID:  <20041130203643.GB20833@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <54142.1101843659@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20041130192316.GB3845@ip.net.ua> <54142.1101843659@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--V0207lvV8h4k8FAm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:40:59PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20041130192316.GB3845@ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes:
>=20
> >> The reason I did not remove MNT_NODEV but only #defined it to zero was
> >> to make it silently ignored.
> >>=20
> >To make it silently ignored, you should have left it with its old value.
> >Most operations with MNT_* constants are "bitwise AND", and so zero was
> >not a good choice.
>=20
> I tried to find my copy of "Bitmaps for dummies" to check what
> you're saying but I can't find it right now, still, I'm very sure
> that you are wrong, I just don't have the book to prove it.
>=20
> Most operations on MNT_* are "bitwise OR" and a zero is perfectly OK.
>=20
Well, definitely *not* in sbin/mount/mount.c.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--V0207lvV8h4k8FAm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBrNnbqRfpzJluFF4RAoebAJ9VxWIh89i+MguDFxVxXec4UcWsiwCfRiHW
qWzXVLtJq7ULu8fnUQ+zalc=
=PDuS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--V0207lvV8h4k8FAm--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041130203643.GB20833>