From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 6 07:17:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA20891 for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 07:17:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA20842 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 07:16:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.5) id KAA27542; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 10:16:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 10:16:24 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199801061516.KAA27542@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Mike Smith Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ftp(1) (was: Re: Time to retire fetch? ) In-Reply-To: <199801061322.XAA00489@word.smith.net.au> References: <199801051509.KAA23284@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <199801061322.XAA00489@word.smith.net.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > In practice, how bogus is this? If you want the 'nlst' behaviour, > there is the 'nlist' command. (If it *is* bogus, feel free to change > it back, or ask me to...) No, I don't want `NLST', I want `LIST'. The 4.4 FTP client always used `LIST' whether you asked for a `ls' or a `dir'. This is the correct behavior, since `NLST' rarely includes all the information you want. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick