From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 17:26:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4540B16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB9543D55 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:26:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (p54AAFA96.dip.t-dialin.net [84.170.250.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38E030E38; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42A487E4.1010601@incubus.de> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:29:08 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050526) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iulian M References: <200506061402.j56E22tG021214@lurza.secnetix.de> <200506061708.41873.eti@erata.net> In-Reply-To: <200506061708.41873.eti@erata.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 OpenPGP: id=6FF22C9F; url=http://www.mkbuelow.net/mkbkeys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystems not properly unmounted [OT] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:26:51 -0000 Iulian M wrote: > http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/big-picture.html#faq-6.5 > > it's about the best programing language ... but if you replace "programing > language" with "OS" it still applys. >From the web page: "Anyone who argues in favor of one language over another in a purely technical manner (i.e., who ignores the dominant business issues) exposes themself as a techie weenie, and deserves not to be heard." I wouldn't argue that the point the person wants to express doesn't have some truth in it but imho anyone who talks in such a condescending tone about "tech weenies" when they present logically sound arguments is someone who deserves not to be heard. mkb.