Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:50:03 +0800 From: wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Wen Heping <wen@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r304485 - in head/finance: . trytond_product_measurements Message-ID: <CACi771-AY1oNcdZeHAY5fcOxj-JheSqehgGjhTTAUpxB5Sfv6g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120919074412.GA69647@FreeBSD.org> References: <201209190740.q8J7ecfK049593@svn.freebsd.org> <20120919074412.GA69647@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/9/19 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:40:38AM +0000, Wen Heping wrote: > > New Revision: 304485 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/304485 > > > > --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added) > > +++ head/finance/trytond_product_measurements/Makefile Wed Sep 19 > 07:40:37 2012 (r304485) > > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ > > +# New ports collection makefile for: trytond_product_measurements > > +# Date created: 07 September, 2012 > > +# Whom: Matthias Petermann<matthias@petermann.it> > > +# > > +# $FreeBSD$ > > +# > > Not sure if you're been following recent discussions, but 6-line header > should not appear in new ports (especially when it's so badly formatted). > Is it compulsory to use new ports header format now ? But I did not get this decision from portmgr@. wen > > ./danfe >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACi771-AY1oNcdZeHAY5fcOxj-JheSqehgGjhTTAUpxB5Sfv6g>