From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 13:58:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9516F16A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:58:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E730343D54 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:58:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9FDvrAZ007080; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:57:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i9FDvmv3007079; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:57:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:57:48 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Herve Boulouis Message-ID: <20041015155748.A4506@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20041014114647.A69222@ra.aabs> <20041014125330.GB3528@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20041014150624.B69222@ra.aabs> <20041014131929.GD3528@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20041015105439.A79558@ra.aabs> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20041015105439.A79558@ra.aabs>; from amon@sockar.homeip.net on Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:54:39AM +0200 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1; AVE: 6.28.0.7; VDF: 6.28.0.19; host: newtrinity.zeist.de) cc: Ken Smith cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange timing problems with BETA7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:58:07 -0000 On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:54:39AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote: > Le 14/10/2004 à 09:19, Ken Smith a écrit: > > > > ISO's? This looks like the configuration before the final set > > of timer related patches, I think the last chunk went in late > > last week. If you cvsup now you should get everything. Your > > After 14 hours of uptime, I'm seeing the same symptoms than before > (ping & netstat stuck, ...) but there is less errors in dmesg : > > pid 1095 (wget), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) > calcru: negative runtime of -967798 usec for pid 1119 (traceroute) > calcru: negative runtime of -911825 usec for pid 1126 (vi) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 13956864383 usec to 13956492689 usec for pid 12 (idle: cpu0) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 12797934342 usec to 12797704335 usec for pid 11 (idle: cpu1) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 13956864383 usec to 13956492689 usec for pid 12 (idle: cpu0) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 13956864383 usec to 13956138414 usec for pid 12 (idle: cpu0) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 12797934342 usec to 12797574096 usec for pid 11 (idle: cpu1) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 13956864383 usec to 13956138414 usec for pid 12 (idle: cpu0) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 13956864383 usec to 13955427447 usec for pid 12 (idle: cpu0) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 12797934342 usec to 12797008556 usec for pid 11 (idle: cpu1) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 13956864383 usec to 13955427447 usec for pid 12 (idle: cpu0) > calcru: runtime went backwards from 12797934342 usec to 12797008556 usec for pid 11 (idle: cpu1) > calcru: negative runtime of -282593 usec for pid 1140 (more) > > The strange thing is that the negative latencies in traceroute are > definitely gone, could there be 2 different problems here ? > Are there other problems like time elapsing too fast on that machine?