From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 05:15:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762E216A417 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DDB13C468 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m165FiCK090165; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:15:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id O+gCamBuO9yK; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:15:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (dsl.daleco.biz [209.125.108.70]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m165Fc7l090161; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:15:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <47A94275.608@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:15:33 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070418 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with router problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:15:46 -0000 Eugen wrote: > Are there really no experienced FreeBSD users who can help me > with my "behind a router" problem ? Should I post it again ? > Should I just give up using BSD altogether due to an unusable > system? I would not like this idea, I was really starting to like it. > > Respectfully, > Eugen Hello. I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble. Have you attempted static assignment to another address, such as 192.168.1.38 (something not 33, but within your "pool")? # ifconfig dc0 down # ifconfig dc0 inet 192.168.1.38 netmask 255.255.255.0 # ping 192.168.1.1 What does `arp -a` say? Does ping work if you call it with `ping -I dc0 192.168.1.1`? What does `traceroute 192.168.1.1` give you? And, I've only seen output for the one interface (maybe I overlooked something in your posts), what is the output of "ifconfig -a" --- is there some other interface that could be causing route problems and therefore "network unreachable" from ping(8)? It does seem rather odd, so I wonder if there's something we are all overlooking. Since no one but you is there, we can't tell you what it is, but only guess. Maybe something above will give us all a clue :-) Also respectfully, ;-) Kevin Kinsey -- Conscience doth make cowards of us all. -- Shakespeare