Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Oct 2002 04:39:42 -0700
From:      David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>
To:        Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: swapoff?
Message-ID:  <20021008113942.GB319@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210072146150.9216-100000@root.org>
References:  <20021007153845.GA371@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210072146150.9216-100000@root.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>:
> Nice, thanks for doing this.  How about some more accurate names for the
> userland routines instead of "this_is_swapoff" and "twiddle"?

Sure, suggest something and I'll change it.  I shamelessly stole
'this_is_swapoff' from w / uptime, but you can blame me for
'twiddle'.  The function was originally called 'add', I think, but
now it adds or removes depending on whether it's being called as
swapon or swapoff...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021008113942.GB319>