From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 12:48:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F308116A432 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3B243DB2 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Dvww9-0000v8-W9; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:47:35 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dvww3-0002PM-Ld; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:47:28 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:47:27 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Panagiotis Astithas In-Reply-To: <42E0B533.2060306@ebs.gr> Message-ID: References: <1120942860.19352.7.camel@localhost.eu.mscsoftware.com> <42D99A15.7090408@ebs.gr> <42DEBF05.9050103@ebs.gr> <1121975583.994.14.camel@beaster> <42E000B5.6050903@zonnet.nl> <42E0B533.2060306@ebs.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: -- Cc: Frank Staals , Ralf Folkerts , freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.1 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:48:21 -0000 On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > Weird, I have never seen the src error myself. Could both of you send me > privately (or put somewhere and send me a link to) the full output of a build > up to that point? Something like: > > make clean build |& tee /var/tmp/eclipse.log > > I'll see if I can reproduce it this weekend. No need to worry about the javac > warnings, though. I saw this too, but only when I'd made a copy of java/eclipse-devel somewhere outside the ports tree, patched it, and run from there. Once I patched the "real" port, it apepared to work correctly. Having said that, there was no apparentl reason I could discern that the build should have failed. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 9287088 or 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Solution: (n) a watered-down version of something neat.