From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 18 03:50:53 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA22169 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 03:50:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA22158 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 03:50:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id WAA07251; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 22:18:11 +1030 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199512181148.WAA07251@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: 2.2-current with 2.1R ? To: uwp@cs.tu-berlin.de (Udo Wolter) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 22:18:11 +1030 (CST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199512180801.JAA09135@blasuarr.cs.tu-berlin.de> from "Udo Wolter" at Dec 18, 95 09:01:17 am MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Udo Wolter stands accused of saying: > I tried it. It works ok. Just things like ps won't work (but that was clear > before). But I haven't noticed a better working with SCO binaries. I tried > to use WordPerfect 5.1. Only the normal wp and wp in an wpxtool worked. The > real X-version xwp crashed with a segmantation fault. I think the new SCO-code > isn't worth to get a 2.2-current kernel. WP 6 (static version) works fine under -curent from late november. > Udo Wolter, email: uwp@cs.tu-berlin.de & uwp@hydmech.fb12.tu-berlin.de, -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 041-122-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] "Who does BSD?" "We do Chucky, we do." [[