From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 13 14:09:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA28227 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 14:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atropos.c2.org (atropos.c2.org [140.174.185.14]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA28220 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 14:09:15 -0700 (PDT) From: sameer@c2.org Received: (from sameer@localhost) by atropos.c2.org (8.7.4/CSUA) id OAA03197; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 14:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604132101.OAA03197@atropos.c2.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD as DNS To: phil@kconline.com (Phil Lewis) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 14:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <31702B77.C2D@kconline.com> from "Phil Lewis" at Apr 13, 96 03:32:23 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk it's my understanding that the next release of the Netscape Server software doesn't support the Intel-BSD UNIXes. Try Apache. > We're a new ISP looking to put in our own DNS. We have a T-1 being > installed the 1st of May. I've heard many good things about FreeBSD. I > was wondering if you would have more specific info on how FreeBSD works > with the new Netscape server software. Is this even necessary? The other > area we are considering is NT but not sure about its stability. > > Thanks for your input > > -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3 Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734 The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376 http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.net