From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Oct  2  1:54:51 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5304C37B401
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-88.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905A043E3B
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 134B466B79; Wed,  2 Oct 2002 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 01:54:48 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>
To: Nick Nauwelaerts <nick@wanadoo.be>
Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD's tar susceptible to this?
Message-ID: <20021002085448.GA67610@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20021001104558.00d3f900@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20021001113225.034331b0@localhost> <20021002104203.3abf8486.nick@wanadoo.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021002104203.3abf8486.nick@wanadoo.be>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-security.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-security>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-security>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:42:03AM +0200, Nick Nauwelaerts wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 11:35:03 -0600
> Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Unfortunately, GNU tar has become so pervasive
> > that even OpenBSD (which avoids GNU software) uses
> > it. Gotta break this dependency upon GPLed code.
>=20
> FreeBSD's, NetBSD's & OpenBSD's tar/pax is BSD licensed, not GLPed.

This thread is off-topic.  Please restrain yourself from continuing
the discussion in this forum.

Kris

--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9mrRYWry0BWjoQKURAqxYAKCEQqsuFwmzYc/SBzsJEGkEfdvkiACg7J3l
OKBPxoaky1AD+3P3db4jSrE=
=ZsoO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DocE+STaALJfprDB--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message