From owner-freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Wed Feb 22 17:06:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37229CE9989 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0166316E4 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 203so5326034ith.0 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:06:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=D5MPTNKyuHWyyswTKopC9sFqsFcKMoDdAmkWsR8CZho=; b=DnpILdRkGp0ip5ihJrS5jGLF8rcRgraexqaqFoYicUp71XRa0+8wRQjf8L66RjLXWf mTiqcU/Z6wjWBkZVS7SCnDOvWi8bFmqLkjuEcPozjmDBD4uulhT/AFMM8N9BNAunb8yb aZrZIahOSYoALOfqWYLInKuRa+x4dMeasiZZM45si0gmm87ntQhzz2qzZtPIzkkbUOFW WlmcOPEbC5lDgwDYnuHwvT/rn3q/z46c1jXr7W47ABxsUi6n6wwNX/EFcFkrdsb3DbGf s/PpZ+NTKrZFRfYd9FiqeorBAIUanGszV18OoiNmNsDYeF7es7kU8QGS1/GlAUZYf/th pXDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D5MPTNKyuHWyyswTKopC9sFqsFcKMoDdAmkWsR8CZho=; b=mtGsMkQNWDlIb+mkKgSlv/niP6uT1P5eYzOiaVqhwZhzA6jgbi8szwnq9LoKDYmOOL RpS2KSs7dVLX3LU5AbBFXJrpRK5JoakQ1WYrTj6V8u4BzGskNE8EDY+YHua38hus8Cya PIm+b3OR8L43NdulMlMOM9xRub8/e91HHkRtTPbDF7pVIYRSPFTYQ3A72gbAjXw8rVz3 KNpjte/SI+8filvuDhmvtnb1Wrm4U7vzP0AQdmCHThqkBReyOQ77Upi3YEUw+9+DfQFc qGe7qdCarnU4sGWwLqEwsDQ/gUeOt6pRmBSX+hUMJ+kZNm/ikol7sa7canSfFEPfZtr1 CYjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39noIn6H1G6mRvpAH+QpWyx91QtH556fQ4PJ+2h/faj5uf38xcf9KLRnpdQF46qAEScRx4nwoUy483N35g== X-Received: by 10.36.2.65 with SMTP id 62mr2997879itu.83.1487783218423; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:06:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.39.17 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:06:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170221194748.GA16066@britannica.bec.de> From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:06:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yKmCIwrHbEI2Nd3uVFN2JbX8BGY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Retiring __ABICALLS__ To: Warner Losh Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:06:59 -0000 On 21 February 2017 at 14:56, Warner Losh wrote: > While this is for NetBSD, I think we should do something similar, if > such work isn't already in progress. > > Warner > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Joerg Sonnenberger > Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:47 PM > Subject: Retiring __ABICALLS__ > To: port-mips@netbsd.org > > > Hello all, > GCC has moved to defining __mips_abicalls when -mabicalls is used a long > time ago for the generic MIPS code. I agree with Warner. FYI, this came up on the LLVM list, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D29032. The initial patch proposed defining __mips_abicalls on Linux (only) and __ABICALLS__ on the BSDs (only). Joerg and I argued for having __mips_abicalls defined everywhere.