From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Jan 23 03:35:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA03324
          for security-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 03:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA03310
          for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 03:35:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA00324; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 03:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199601231133.DAA00324@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Ownership of files/tcp_wrappers port 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Jan 1996 13:19:26 +0200."
             <199601231119.NAA01191@grumble.grondar.za> 
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 03:33:53 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


  From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
  Subject: Re: Ownership of files/tcp_wrappers port 
  
  You mean put something like
  
  .if (wrappers_lib_exists_in_local)
  SUPPORT_WRAPPERS	= yes
  .endif

Probably something like

  .if (/usr/local/lib/libwrap.a) and !defined(NO_WRAPPERS)

so that distribution binaries can still be built (use whatever the
convention is that we do elsewhere and document the root makefile).
  
  in the appropriate Makefiles?
  
  > Reasonable compromise?
  
  Yup. (And they said the art of negotiation was dead!)

:-)

Glad to be of service.