From owner-freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 21:37:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gecko@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E62C14AF2DC for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C0F6E849 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EF25D14AF2D4; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gecko@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9D514AF2D3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD296E841 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC840F0DC for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0QLbF7e053972 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0QLbFn6053971 for gecko@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235215] Bump LLVM_DEFAULT to 80 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:37:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235215 --- Comment #5 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #2) > the latest LLVM release is 7.0.1, so this PR is premature. I'm trying to get everyone on board (or off board) by the time devel/llvm80= is updated to the actual release. Some maintainers may need time to evaluate t= he risk but being on LLVM_DEFAULT train assumes silence after timeout is an agreement. Otherwise, there's a risk of HEAD and 2019Q2 ending up with different LLVM_DEFAULT, complicating maintenance. (In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #3) > ikos says that they will fix compatibility once llvm-8 is released. Not quite. According to https://github.com/NASA-SW-VnV/ikos/issues/96#issuecomment-457843971 it doe= sn't look like ikos upstream plans to keep compatibility with llvm70 much like t= hey haven't with llvm60 or llvm50/llvm40. So, I don't understand why you insist= on using LLVM_DEFAULT in the port when it breaks if user specifies non-default value via DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dllvm=3DNN. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=