Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:52:43 -0600
From:      Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
To:        Jan Knepper <jan@digitaldaemon.com>
Cc:        Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net>,  "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Which program produces FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-*-disc1.iso ?
Message-ID:  <CAOtMX2gY7q9ELicd9P7m8d-mUakEuJsWKCppJs1qXMTYnXS0dA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C58BD8B-991D-4CB3-B319-157C20EA2B55@digitaldaemon.com>
References:  <73D2694F-BB8D-4369-8846-3A1056ABD9F9@digitaldaemon.com> <4020582369874944691@scdbackup.webframe.org> <5C58BD8B-991D-4CB3-B319-157C20EA2B55@digitaldaemon.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Jan Knepper <jan@digitaldaemon.com> wrote:
>
>
> ManiaC++
> Jan Knepper
>
>> On Oct 6, 2015, at 02:25, Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Alan Somers wrote:
>>>>>>> the FreeBSD project has had a free Coverity account for a
>>
>> i wrote:
>>>>>> i would be interested in my own upstream stuff
>>
>> Jan Knepper wrote:
>>> I am presuming that the question was about the ports code that is downloaded
>>> and build.
>>
>> Yes, i hoped for a cheap code review of my libraries and
>> command line tools written in C.
>
> Coverity is much better than a cheap code review. I think you can get a demo for free.
> Companies can not hire a person to do what Coverity does for the price it costs. www.coverity.com
>
>>
>>
>>> I personally think that is more the responsibility of the specific
>>> port development team...
>
> I would have to check, but if it is open source I think Coverity will scan it for free (gov't grant).


That's right.  You can register new projects here:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/new


>
>>
>> If i could get contact to that team, i would first ask for update
>> from 1.3.4 to 1.4.0 (18 months between them). That might already
>> replace some boring old bugs by interesting new ones.
>>
>> Actually i stumbled over the makefs problems when making regression
>> tests with xorriso. libisofs and the Linux kernel showed strange
>> differences. First i fixed the bugs in libisofs, then i diagnosed
>> the ones in Linux, and then i reported the remaing problems here.
>> (One just has to shake the tree hard enough ...)
>>
>> FreeBSD and NetBSD ISOs are somewhat exotic, viewed from mkisofs
>> traditions. Nevertheless the most strange ISO i got is a firmware
>> repair ISO for hard disks. It contains no files but only a boot
>> image which actually is DOS-on-a-floppy.
>>
>>
>> Have a nice day :)
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2gY7q9ELicd9P7m8d-mUakEuJsWKCppJs1qXMTYnXS0dA>