From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 29 12:16:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hub.FreeBSD.org (hub.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB806AA0;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:16:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:16:48 -0400
From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To: beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 Now Available
Message-ID: <20140929121648.GL75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
References: <20140928155118.GA75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
 <fe17030e3efeefb5dfa800b46ee181d9.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
 <20140929025102.GH75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
 <20140929031120.GI75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
 <ebef3a6c539a7be6d6a953b1a0278049.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s0AIMtcnAlS2OWxa"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ebef3a6c539a7be6d6a953b1a0278049.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64
X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss
X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:16:52 -0000


--s0AIMtcnAlS2OWxa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:42:30AM +0200, beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> Thanks gjb@!  I will watch for those, so I can verify BETA3 and later
> before testing/using.
>=20

The new subkeys are signed with my old keys, so verification shouldn't
be an issue.

> > Anyway, this is not RE-related.
>=20
> Jah, 'RE-related' would be public verify method for whole svn repo tied to
> audit trail of release process. :-(
>=20

I don't understand what you mean.  We have a verifiable audit trail - it
is all in svn revision history.

Glen


--s0AIMtcnAlS2OWxa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUKU2wAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTPkUP/26CZHdvhssBJurK5HYJOZeJ
rUd5xyv/LZjzc5LRGOKRRfxRooXlS2fUoZT2tCDLxlZGlfkgLJ7kR2RU+AU2ysqr
ME62mPlyIzButXiTqbdGpU1s7I9JnSPzObVLN4qSzXasehXGrI7FcLFdzf/YGJbR
DuFVcnvSNVLiG/iRx+XMlsWyUEz+mL5q1enwlfMGzUgCvFNnKz85m3cmaUkKwPp0
TQZxxpkUgVf+rf9d2FYEhrNOfrWDVuFbEN9KTe8drxWCjJgHQa623pWV8GX5rGgv
3OP3mGVmBzqHq55lIcptWLC3JcT7hr3hMP4hrOUDoNi9ysafRa20yGKPT4QJpi3y
KnmudS4P5xp6VDNwN4Jx4vHv0v3n3eRJDvK2m4Qe2jVOKf1OQ7J2zKeggJV6he4w
qfsf8GhCZtgbjXKD7Og2IRViV655tDJH8qF2U13p2cqfkXjZvIbtXXAZAlA9LTeq
tG4oVvBZ7kIC0eTf5YzXCaVVufUx0/cL/j3oBdxJW7jIKRfcz5VGM+6qaBFD1mz+
fQMw6fQ7Zbcn19PCefhcmcQRAWCOm+eNuZQwE1zbVH+nLXH3TmnsbARDoTdM2myO
8i9JPRdHbh87bJg7pxc6wTf4lyMucbybxTsVXNHexQPY+ger4P/pAqdGYV5fRBCI
DZHxdckKHPvKk7VYa471
=7/N2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--s0AIMtcnAlS2OWxa--