From owner-cvs-all Sat May 13 13:41:10 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (peter1.yahoo.com [208.48.107.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C519E37B733; Sat, 13 May 2000 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7508C1CDF; Sat, 13 May 2000 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha mem.c In-Reply-To: Message from "David O'Brien" of "Sat, 13 May 2000 08:51:33 PDT." <20000513085132.A74463@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 13:41:02 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20000513204102.7508C1CDF@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David O'Brien" wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 12:43:00AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Log: > > There are still too many diffs relative to the i386 version. > > Couldn't the two be merged? (perhaps with just a very few #ifdef's) More of it maybe, but take (for instance) the physical addresses. They are 32bit vs. 64 bit. /dev/mem and /dev/kmem are different too. IMHO, /dev/null, /dev/zero, /dev/[u]random etc have no business being in the same driver as /dev/[k]mem. I think *that* is the basic mistake here. Everything but mem/kmem should be in a MI "misc devices" driver. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message