From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 29 19:43:58 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA13720 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 19:43:58 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA13712; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 19:43:52 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA08275; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 19:43:39 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id TAA00331; Wed, 29 Mar 1995 19:43:39 -0800 Message-Id: <199503300343.TAA00331@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Andrew McRae , hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Configuring driver added via LKM In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Mar 95 19:36:31 PST." <13542.796534591@freefall.cdrom.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 19:43:36 -0800 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> I am in the midst of hacking the PCMCIA stuff to remove it from >> the ISA model and place it under a separate bus. Meantime I am >> redoing the kernel interface to the drivers to allow a much >> better disconnect and reconnect scheme. The benefit of > >Is this a 2.1 thing or should we be shooting more for 2.2 (late >summer) with this? > >If it's 2.1, you have only a week or two left to fold in the working >code, so I strongly suspect that we shouldn't even try. 2.2 in >the September timeframe sounds far more achievable. Yeah, like Jordan says, if this is going to be in 2.1 then someone needs to start a marathon session to get it in. It either needs to be in the next snapshot or not until 2.2. -DG