From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 22:29:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1451106567A for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (mr0.ht-systems.ru [78.110.50.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B33F8FC0A for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [85.21.245.235] (helo=orion.SpringDaemons.com) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1L56PK-0005Yc-TX; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:29:23 +0300 Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3085F398F3; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:30:52 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:30:47 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov To: stevefranks@ieee.org Message-Id: <20081126013047.e91ccbdd.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90811251345i6c864442vebe71ee8654fd3fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081125.104452.535842403.imp@bsdimp.com> <539c60b90811251345i6c864442vebe71ee8654fd3fc@mail.gmail.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Code review request: boards on AT91 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:29:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:45:14 -0700 "Steve Franks" mentioned: > I sure like where you're headed. Were it ever to become possible, I'd > love a nano-bsd like environment on my NXP LPC2138 ARM7 processor. > It's got 512k flash & 32k ram embedded and it's 60MHz, so it might be > a bit anemic, but hey, they can run uClinux, and I hate to let those > linux guys have the last laugh ;) I don't think it's possible. This CPU lacks MMU and MPU, thus no memory space separation at all. uClinux is not the Linux, after all. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkksfJwACgkQK/VZk+smlYETcQCdEbsZBC2Z+tsA6e99nYO2LH3e lHcAnRtBPn+EdSRFYysVAjXejrsXVArv =6FiJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----