From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 29 12:14:40 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4644016A416;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:14:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F50C43D69;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:14:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com)
Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk)
	by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>)
	id 1GTHFo-000Hhk-Ew; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:14:08 +0100
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>)
	id 1GTHFo-0002Ei-3M; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:14:08 +0100
To: dg@dglawrence.com
In-Reply-To: <20060929104427.GN14975@tnn.dglawrence.com>
Message-Id: <E1GTHFo-0002Ei-3M@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:14:08 +0100
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ob@e-Gitt.NET, jhb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:14:40 -0000

>    Do you have any history of seeing the watchdog timeout problem on your
> machine?

O.K., I just finished compiing up a uniprocessor kenel for the machine
on which I had been seeing bge0 timeouts, and the lopppoll.c code
has no effect there. The kerenl I am running is the latest STABLE from
a couple of hours ago.

-pete.