From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jan 12 01:46:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA00792
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jan 1996 01:46:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA00781
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 1996 01:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA13247; Fri, 12 Jan 1996 01:44:29 -0800
To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey)
cc: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com, hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
Subject: Re: Status of ISDN drivers 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 Jan 1996 10:20:49 +0100."
             <199601120920.KAA20789@allegro.lemis.de> 
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 01:44:29 -0800
Message-ID: <13242.821439869@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> What do you mean by 'sync'?  Do you really want to get down to layer
> 2?  In any case, you would only need one board: they handle a complete
> BRI.

I mean I want to run 8 bit bytes down the line, not 10 bit bytes. :-)
Clocked serial.  Synchronous serial.

I'd also need two cards - I manage both ends of the link, right? :-)
I wouldn't mind moving the serial load off of freefall anyway.
A semi-intelligent ISDN card could be stuck into a number of different
machines at WC.

						Jordan