Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:38:05 -0800 From: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IoT OS Message-ID: <F37089F2-6467-4366-8AE9-C8BD0BF6E6F7@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56A10892.2090308@rlwinm.de> References: <CAP8XrcszH-KroGv3nJo5AyH=Mh%2BAe6YhAKNi4SuEEs9ss9M8Rg@mail.gmail.com> <56A10892.2090308@rlwinm.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jan 21, 2016, at 08:34, Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> wrote: > >> On 21/01/16 17:19, Mathieu Prevot wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to connect several connected object (with homogeneous or >> heterogenous hardare: intel edison, samsung artik, apple AX, intel core, >> etc) so the calculation needs, the storage/memory, the connection, etc are >> decoupled; hence we can reach an ecosystem with several clouds. >> >> How do you recommend to reach that ? from the kernel, a module, or >> eventually a software ? > > Your message contains neither enough information nor a precise enough question for anyone to provide you a helpful answer. > > Please describe your problem in sufficient detail and reformulate your question. If you still think these mailing lists (current@ and hackers@) are a good audience for your question afterward ask them again. It depends on your workload and hardware requirements (there isn't a simple answer to your question because you didn't describe what you needed with concrete requirements). I would talk to cem@. He's working on ioat(4) on head for us ($work). Thanks, -NGie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F37089F2-6467-4366-8AE9-C8BD0BF6E6F7>