From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Jan 23 05:57:58 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA02419
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 05:57:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA02388;
          Fri, 23 Jan 1998 05:57:52 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA00331;
	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 13:57:50 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id OAA15193;
	Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:57:50 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <19980123145750.59255@follo.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:57:50 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 2.2.6 release schedule.
References: <4618.884958736@time.cdrom.com> <199801230308.DAA00632@awfulhak.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e
In-Reply-To: <199801230308.DAA00632@awfulhak.org>; from Brian Somers on Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 03:08:46AM +0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 03:08:46AM +0000, Brian Somers wrote:
> > 2.2.5 was released early last November and that means that our
> > quarterly release schedule points at the end of February as the target
> > release date.
> [.....]
> 
> This begs the question; how to people feel about the latest ppp 
> sources going into -stable.  It's undergone a *lot* of work, the main 
> changes being the security model (now more flexible), deflate 
> compression, M$ Chap (without hurting the release crunch stuff), lots 
> of overflow bugs fixed, lots of routing table limits removed, random 
> IP allocation and external chat(8) capabilities.

Those overflow fixes more or less have to go into -stable.

Besides that, I feel that you can merge all of it as long as it works,
but I'm not The Powers That Be ;-)

Eivind.