From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 16 21:24:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA06371 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 21:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA06365 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 21:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.2) id OAA22648; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:24:15 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <19970417142415.39844@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:24:15 +1000 From: David Dawes To: johnp@lodgenet.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsh and ppp References: <199704170334.WAA00383@knight.trosoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69 In-Reply-To: <199704170334.WAA00383@knight.trosoft.com>; from John Prince on Wed, Apr 16, 1997 at 10:34:28PM -0500 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, Apr 16, 1997 at 10:34:28PM -0500, John Prince wrote: >Why does the rsh command not work when alias is enabled with ppp? >I get the error ... >"select: protocol failure in circuit setup" >This happens only on ppp connections. On the local net rsh works fine. >Release 2.2.1-RELEASE.. When I tried this a while ago, I found that reserved ports were getting mapped to non-reserved ports, thus breaking things like rsh, rlogin, etc. David