From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 19 02:34:21 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8344C16A41C;
	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:34:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CF343D53;
	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:34:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 53EE1296E; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:34:20 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:34:20 -0500
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050719023420.GA22450@soaustin.net>
References: <200507190232.j6J2W6M7031373@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200507190232.j6J2W6M7031373@freefall.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, horance@freera.net
Subject: Re: ports/74195: fix build error of devel/swarm for gcc 3.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:34:21 -0000

On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:32:06AM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote:
> This change depended on a local gcc modification which apparently
> never got committed.  In addition, there were unresolved installation
> issues with the port that this PR did not address, and that the
> upstream authors were unwilling to help resolve.

Actually, on rechecking, I'm confusing this with one of the other
ports that got deleted -- the latter comment is untrue.  My apologies.
Nevertheless, the former comment seems correct.