From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 30 19:57:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AAC16A41C for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:57:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [66.150.201.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D2C843D1D for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:57:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 42032 invoked by uid 399); 30 Jun 2005 19:57:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.fluidhosting.com) (66.150.201.101) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2005 19:57:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 49996 invoked by uid 399); 30 Jun 2005 19:57:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.0.35.182?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@192.0.35.182) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2005 19:57:34 -0000 Message-ID: <42C4328C.9000604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:57:32 -0500 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <20050620151628.0F90043D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42B68641.3070603@FreeBSD.org> <20050621064904.GB33520@cell.sick.ru> <42B84B90.60004@FreeBSD.org> <20050622073717.GA47513@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050622073717.GA47513@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Danny Cooper Subject: Re: named coredumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:57:36 -0000 FYI, I had a chat with the ISC folks this week, and they said in clear terms that enabling threads on current versions of BIND would be a pessimization. I have already turned off threads in the port of 9.3.1, and am looking at doing that for the base as well. Could you give the port a try for now (with or without the option to overwrite the base system BIND), and let me know if that helps/solves your problems? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection