From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 13 14:54:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA00546 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tombstone.sunrem.com ([206.81.134.54]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA00532 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 14:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from brandon@localhost) by tombstone.sunrem.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA10666; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 15:53:58 -0600 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 15:53:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Brandon Gillespie To: sameer@c2.org cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as DNS In-Reply-To: <199604132101.OAA03197@atropos.c2.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 13 Apr 1996 sameer@c2.org wrote: > it's my understanding that the next release of the Netscape > Server software doesn't support the Intel-BSD UNIXes. > > > We're a new ISP looking to put in our own DNS. We have a T-1 being > > installed the 1st of May. I've heard many good things about FreeBSD. I > > was wondering if you would have more specific info on how FreeBSD works > > with the new Netscape server software. Is this even necessary? The other > > area we are considering is NT but not sure about its stability. > > > > Thanks for your input Yes, try apache; I've used both and frankly I dont see a reason to use Netscape's server when you can use Apache. If you want the secure end you can pay for it (at about 1/3 what it would cost to get netscape) from various people who have extended apache. Info is at: http://www.apache.org/ -Brandon Gillespie-