From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 31 15:16:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AD237B86A for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:16:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 12bAea-000L1o-00; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:16:36 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA25467; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:16:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:16:36 +0100 From: J McKitrick To: Richard Wackerbarth Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stability and versions - was Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <20000401001635.A25259@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20000331153137.C21703@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <00033117101800.06684@nomad.dataplex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <00033117101800.06684@nomad.dataplex.net>; from rkw@dataplex.net on Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 04:43:02PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think one simple solution is to 'hide' the -current distro, or make it a little less accessible. That seems like a good first step. No one who can't figure it out needs tobe running it anyway, and it certainly won't hurt the development effort. Then, of course, keep whipping 4.x into shape, tack on a decent, if not graphical, interface and let it sell itself. Er, raher, give itself away. jm -- -------------------------------------------- Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org "You're the guy from the Hambuger Train, right?" -------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message